Case Study 2
THREAT ASSESSMENT
This case study focuses on a professional baseball team that engaged FRS (Facility Risk Services) to conduct a comprehensive threat assessment of their stadium. Following a recent shooting incident at another ballpark, the team recognized the need to proactively evaluate potential threats to ensure the safety of players, staff, and spectators.
FRS was tasked with assessing various threats, including active shooter incidents, bomb threats, gang-related activities, and common crimes such as theft and break-ins. The goal was to identify vulnerabilities and provide recommendations to enhance stadium security.
BACKGROUND
The professional baseball team was deeply concerned about the safety and security of their stadium in the aftermath of a shooting incident that occurred at a different ballpark.
Recognizing the potential risks associated with large-scale public events, they decided to partner with FRS, a renowned firm specializing in threat assessments and risk management.
The objective was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of potential threats and develop actionable recommendations to fortify stadium security.
THE PROCESS
3.1 Information Gathering:
FRS initiated the threat assessment process by gathering relevant information about the stadium, its surroundings, and previous security incidents. They analyzed local crime rates, historical data on security incidents at similar venues, and the specific concerns raised by the baseball team.
3.2 On-Site Evaluation:
FRS conducted a detailed on-site evaluation of the stadium, examining its physical layout, entry and exit points, security systems, surveillance infrastructure, and emergency response protocols. They also reviewed existing security procedures, training programs, and coordination with local law enforcement agencies.
3.3 Threat Analysis:
Using the gathered information, FRS analyzed potential threats specific to the stadium. This analysis encompassed active shooter scenarios, bomb threats, gang-related activities, as well as more common crime issues like theft and break-ins. FRS considered various factors, including the stadium’s location, crowd dynamics during games, and recent security trends in the area.
ASSESSMENT FINDINGS
4.1 Active Shooter Threats:
FRS identified potential vulnerabilities related to active shooter incidents, such as inadequate access control, limited security personnel training, and gaps in emergency response protocols. They recognized the need for proactive measures to prevent, detect, and respond to such threats effectively.
4.2 Bomb Threats:
The threat assessment revealed weaknesses in the stadium’s bomb threat response capabilities. FRS observed the absence of comprehensive security screenings, insufficient bomb detection technology, and limited staff training in identifying suspicious behavior or packages. These gaps increased the risk of a successful bomb attack.
4.3 Gang-Related Threats:
Based on their analysis, FRS determined that the stadium’s location and proximity to certain neighborhoods heightened the potential for gang-related activities. They noted the necessity of measures to deter gang involvement, such as enhanced surveillance, improved lighting, and closer collaboration with local law enforcement.
4.4 Common Crime Issues:
FRS highlighted weaknesses in the stadium’s security measures against common crimes like theft and break-ins. Inadequate access controls, vulnerable parking areas, and insufficient security personnel contributed to an elevated risk of criminal activities targeting spectators and facility assets.
RECOMMENDATIONS
FRS provided the professional baseball team with a comprehensive set of recommendations to address the identified threats and enhance stadium security:
5.1 Active Shooter Preparedness:
FRS recommended implementing a comprehensive active shooter preparedness program, including training for security personnel and staff, enhancing emergency response protocols, conducting regular drills and simulations, and installing physical security measures like panic buttons and bulletproof barriers at critical locations.
5.2 Bomb Threat Response:
To mitigate bomb threats, SMG advised implementing rigorous security screenings for all individuals entering the stadium, including bag checks and metal detectors. They recommended deploying explosive detection technology and canine units for increased detection capabilities. Moreover, enhancing staff training in identifying and responding to suspicious packages was recommended.
5.3 Gang Deterrence:
To address gang-related threats, FRS suggested increasing surveillance coverage, particularly in high-risk areas. They proposed improved lighting in parking lots and adjacent areas to discourage criminal activities. Collaborating with local law enforcement to develop intelligence-sharing protocols and implementing proactive gang prevention programs were also recommended.
5.4 Common Crime Prevention:
FRS recommended enhancing access control measures, such as credential verification and controlled entry points, to prevent unauthorized access to restricted areas. Increasing the presence of security personnel, improving perimeter security, and installing surveillance cameras in vulnerable areas were advised. Additionally, implementing regular security audits and providing training to staff and spectators on crime prevention measures would help reduce common crime incidents.
By proactively engaging FRS for a comprehensive threat assessment, the professional baseball team successfully identified potential vulnerabilities and received actionable recommendations to enhance stadium security.
The collaboration between the team, FRS, and local law enforcement agencies demonstrated a commitment to prioritizing safety and creating a secure environment for players, staff, and spectators. The implementation of recommended measures serves as a proactive approach in mitigating threats and safeguarding the integrity of the sporting events hosted at the stadium.